Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-09-02

BOMBAY ANAND BHAVAN RESTAURANT vs DY. DIRECTOR , ESI CORPN.

Citation / case number
SC 2003/25547
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BOMBAY ANAND BHAVAN RESTAURANT
Respondent
DY. DIRECTOR , ESI CORPN.
Author
H.L. Dattu

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the provisions of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) apply when an establishment employs 10 or more employees and uses power in its operations. The Court found that the appellant's use of a coffee roaster and bottle cooler, which required electric power, established its coverage under the ESI Act from April 1, 1994. The Court upheld the order of the ESI authorities for payment of contributions, affirming that the appellant was obligated to comply with the ESI Act despite its claims regarding employee numbers and the type of energy used.

BOMBAY ANAND BHAVAN RESTAURANT vs DY. DIRECTOR , ESI CORPN. · Niyam