Munna Lal vs Union Of India & Ors

The Supreme Court held that the disciplinary proceedings against the appellant, a Sub-Inspector of Police, were flawed due to insufficient evidence proving intoxication while on duty. The Court emphasized that the inquiry relied on an incomplete medical report and uncorroborated witness testimonies, failing to meet the burden of proof required for such serious allegations. Consequently, the punishment imposed was deemed illegal, leading to the reinstatement of the appellant with 50% back-wages and recognition of service benefits during the period of absence.