Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-09-15

Fgp Ltd vs Saleh Hooseini Doctor & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Fgp Ltd
Respondent
Saleh Hooseini Doctor & Anr
Bench
Asok Kumar Ganguly, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's revision application, affirming that the appellant, a public limited company with a paid-up share capital exceeding Rs.1 crore, is not entitled to protection under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The Court clarified that the plaintiffs, being the heirs of the original owner, have the right to file a suit for possession under the Bombay Rent Act, 1947, despite the appellant's claims regarding the marriage registration under the Special Marriage Act and its implications on property succession. The Court concluded that the suit for possession was maintainable and the appellant was ordered to vacate the premises.

Fgp Ltd vs Saleh Hooseini Doctor & Anr · Niyam