MOHD.ISMAIL vs DINKAR VINAYAKRAO DORLIKAR

The Supreme Court upheld the eviction order under Clause 13(3)(vi) of the Rent Control Order, 1949, affirming the findings of the Rent Controller and the Additional Collector regarding the respondent's bonafide requirement for the shop. The Court noted that the respondent had demonstrated a genuine need for the premises to start a business, which was supported by evidence. The appeal against the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition was therefore dismissed, confirming the eviction order.