Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-10-26

Parminder Kaur vs State Of U.P. & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 840
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Parminder Kaur
Respondent
State Of U.P. & Anr
Author
V.S. Sirpurkar
Bench
V.S. Sirpurkar, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the proceedings against her under Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC. The Court found that the FIR and the evidence presented were sufficient to establish that an offence was disclosed, particularly regarding the alleged false affidavit submitted by the appellant in civil suits concerning the sale of agricultural property. The Court emphasized that the material collected warranted further proceedings, affirming the High Court's decision to allow the prosecution to continue.

Parminder Kaur vs State Of U.P. & Anr · Niyam