Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-10-22

Haryana State Industrial Dev.Corp vs Shakuntla & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 468
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Haryana State Industrial Dev.Corp
Respondent
Shakuntla & Ors
Author
Tarun Chatterjee
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, V.S. Sirpurkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the Notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, regarding the acquisition of lands in Village Khandsa, stating that the acquisition was discriminatory. The Court emphasized that the land of the respondent, which contained a pucca structure, was treated unfairly compared to similarly situated lands that were released from acquisition. The Court affirmed the High Court's order for the release of the respondent's land, contingent upon maintaining a green belt and paying requisite charges to the HSIDC.

Haryana State Industrial Dev.Corp vs Shakuntla & Ors · Niyam