Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-11-19

M/S Mepco Industries Ltd.Madurai vs Commr.Of Income Tax & Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2009 SC 695
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Mepco Industries Ltd.Madurai
Respondent
Commr.Of Income Tax & Anr
Bench
Deepak Verma, H.L. Dattu, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Commissioner of Income Tax can rectify its own order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based on a subsequent judgment, specifically referencing the case of Sahney Steel and Press Works Limited. The Court established that the power tariff subsidy received by the appellant was a revenue receipt and not a capital receipt, thus liable to be taxed under Section 28 of the Act. The Court affirmed the decisions of the Madras High Court, which upheld the rectification order of the Commissioner of Income Tax.

M/S Mepco Industries Ltd.Madurai vs Commr.Of Income Tax & Anr · Niyam