Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-11-20

Mohd.Ayub vs State Of U.P.Tr.Princl.Sec.& Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 431
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mohd.Ayub
Respondent
State Of U.P.Tr.Princl.Sec.& Ors
Bench
G.S. Singhvi, Asok Kumar Ganguly

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the dismissal of the appellant's application for the post of Armourer due to the late submission of a medical certificate was unjust, as it failed to consider Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, which allows for the extension of time when the last day falls on a holiday. The Court emphasized the importance of equity in administrative decisions and ruled that the appellant's application should have been considered despite the delay in submitting the medical certificate. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order and directed that the appellant's application be considered for the post.

Mohd.Ayub vs State Of U.P.Tr.Princl.Sec.& Ors · Niyam