Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-05-01

ROY ESTATE vs STATE OF JHARKHAND .

Citation / case number
SC 2008/268
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ROY ESTATE
Respondent
STATE OF JHARKHAND .
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of the requisition of property under the Defence of India Rules and the Requisitioning and Acquisitioning of Immovable Property Act, 1952. It held that the Central Government's authority to retain requisitioned property is limited to 17 years as per Section 6(1-A) of the Act, and any transfer of such property without the owner's consent is invalid. The Court ruled that the eviction suit filed by the owner was maintainable despite the previous dismissal for non-prosecution, emphasizing the need for adherence to statutory provisions regarding property requisition.

ROY ESTATE vs STATE OF JHARKHAND . · Niyam