Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-05-11

SMRUTI PAHARIYA vs SANJAY PAHARIYA

Citation / case number
SC 2008/20085
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SMRUTI PAHARIYA
Respondent
SANJAY PAHARIYA
Author
GANGULY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a divorce by mutual consent requires the parties to fulfill specific procedural requirements, including a mandatory waiting period of six months. The Court found that the Family Court's decree of divorce was valid as the parties had complied with the necessary conditions, including the absence of collusion or coercion. The High Court's decision to set aside the Family Court's order was overturned, and the divorce decree was reinstated.

SMRUTI PAHARIYA vs SANJAY PAHARIYA · Niyam