Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-05-08

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, UDAIPUR vs MCDOWELL & CO. LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2004/8391
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, UDAIPUR
Respondent
MCDOWELL & CO. LTD.
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, determining that unpaid bottling fees, secured by a bank guarantee, do not qualify as actual payment for deduction purposes under Section 43B if not paid before the return filing deadline under Section 139(1). The Court also remitted the matter regarding the nature of capital expenditure for new transformers back to the Assessing Officer for further consideration, referencing the principles established in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Saravana Spinning Mills and Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ramaraju Surgical Cotton Mills. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, UDAIPUR vs MCDOWELL & CO. LTD. · Niyam