Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-05-13

M.D., HINDUSTAN PHOTO FILMS vs H.B. VINOBHA .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/4990
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.D., HINDUSTAN PHOTO FILMS
Respondent
H.B. VINOBHA .
Author
TARUN CHATTERJEE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the termination of trainees by the employer was lawful under the Industrial Disputes Act, specifically referencing Section 2(s) which defines workmen. The Court found that the Division Bench of the High Court erred in affirming the Single Judge's order for regularization based solely on an interim order that had been in place for ten years, despite acknowledging the trainees' employment was for a fixed period. The Court quashed the High Court's order and upheld the termination, emphasizing that the respondents should pursue their remedies under the Industrial Disputes Act.

M.D., HINDUSTAN PHOTO FILMS vs H.B. VINOBHA . · Niyam