Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-05-12

AHMED HUSSEIN VALI MOHAMMED SAIYED &ANR. vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Citation / case number
SC 2002/23290
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
AHMED HUSSEIN VALI MOHAMMED SAIYED &ANR.
Respondent
STATE OF GUJARAT
Author
P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions under Section 302 IPC, Section 120-B IPC, Sections 25(1)(c) and 27 of the Arms Act, and Section 5 of the TADA Act, affirming the Designated Court's findings that the appellants conspired to commit murder and executed a planned attack resulting in multiple fatalities. The Court ruled that the confessional statements were admissible despite the appellants' claims of lack of corroborative evidence, as the procedural requirements under TADA were met. The appeals were dismissed, and the sentences, including life imprisonment, were upheld.

AHMED HUSSEIN VALI MOHAMMED SAIYED &ANR. vs STATE OF GUJARAT · Niyam