Bansi vs State Of Maharashtra

The Supreme Court granted bail to the appellant, noting that 9 out of 10 accused had already been released on bail. The refusal of bail for the appellant was primarily based on the presence of incised injuries on the victim and the recovery of a knife from him. However, the Court found it challenging to determine the specific responsibility for the injuries, especially since another accused had already been granted bail. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the appellant was directed to be released on bail subject to the trial court's satisfaction.