Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-05-15

K. Unnikrishnan vs M/S. Magnum Mail Manag. Ser. ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2009 SC 439
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K. Unnikrishnan
Respondent
M/S. Magnum Mail Manag. Ser. ...
Bench
Asok Kumar Ganguly, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the High Court is required to provide reasons when modifying the award of a Tribunal. The Court found that the High Court failed to articulate the basis for enhancing the amount awarded, leading to a lack of transparency in its decision-making process. Consequently, the impugned judgment was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration on merits.

K. Unnikrishnan vs M/S. Magnum Mail Manag. Ser. ... · Niyam