Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-05-13

Ningamma & Anr vs United India Insurance Co.Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 3056
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ningamma & Anr
Respondent
United India Insurance Co.Ltd
Author
Mukundakam Sharma
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, provides for compensation in cases of motor accidents without the need to prove fault, but is applicable only when another vehicle is involved. The Court found that the High Court erred in dismissing the claim on the grounds that no tort-feasor was present and that the income threshold was exceeded, emphasizing that the claimants were entitled to compensation despite the deceased's income exceeding Rs. 40,000 per annum. The Court reinstated the Tribunal's award of Rs. 2,59,800/- as just compensation for the claimants.

Ningamma & Anr vs United India Insurance Co.Ltd · Niyam