Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-05-08

State Of U.P vs Atul Singh Etc. Etc

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 2713
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P
Respondent
Atul Singh Etc. Etc
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Asok Kumar Ganguly, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court analyzed the acquittal of respondents under Section 302 IPC by the Allahabad High Court, which was based on the lack of credible eyewitness testimony from Radhey Shyam Pandey (PW1). The Court noted that the High Court's findings included inconsistencies regarding the eyewitness's presence and the circumstances surrounding the incident. Ultimately, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal, affirming that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt as required under Section 302 IPC.

State Of U.P vs Atul Singh Etc. Etc · Niyam