Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-05-05

Sushil Kumar Jain vs Manoj Kumar & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 2544
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sushil Kumar Jain
Respondent
Manoj Kumar & Anr
Author
Tarun Chatterjee
Bench
H.L. Dattu, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of the tenant's application for amendment of the written statement under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, affirming the High Court's decision. The Court emphasized that amendments should not alter the fundamental nature of the case or introduce new pleas that could mislead the proceedings. The Court found that the proposed amendment did not clarify the tenant's position but rather complicated the matter, thus the appeal was dismissed.

Sushil Kumar Jain vs Manoj Kumar & Anr · Niyam