Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-05-01

Himmat Sukhadeo Wahurwagh & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 2292
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Himmat Sukhadeo Wahurwagh & Ors
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Author
Harjit Singh Bedi
Bench
Aftab Alam, Harjit Singh Bedi, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 302/149 IPC, affirming the Bombay High Court's reversal of the trial court's acquittal. The Court emphasized the validity of dying declarations and eyewitness testimonies, stating that the presence of the accused at the crime scene and the nature of the attack established their culpability. The judgment reinforced the principle that eyewitness accounts, when corroborated by dying declarations, can be sufficient for conviction despite the trial court's skepticism regarding witness credibility.

Himmat Sukhadeo Wahurwagh & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra · Niyam