Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-05-12

Ahmed Hussein Vali Mohammed Saiyed ... vs State Of Gujarat

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ahmed Hussein Vali Mohammed Saiyed ...
Respondent
State Of Gujarat
Author
P. Sathasivam
Bench
J.M. Panchal, P. Sathasivam, K.G. Balakrishnan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions under Section 302 IPC, Section 120-B IPC, Sections 25(1)(c) and 27 of the Arms Act, and Section 5 of the TADA Act, affirming the Designated Court's findings. The Court ruled that confessional statements, despite the appellants' claims of inadmissibility due to lack of corroborative evidence and procedural violations, were valid as they met the necessary legal standards. The appeals were dismissed, and the sentences, including life imprisonment, were confirmed.

Ahmed Hussein Vali Mohammed Saiyed ... vs State Of Gujarat · Niyam