Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-03-16

Gunjan Bansal vs Atul Bansal

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2009 SC 198
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Gunjan Bansal
Respondent
Atul Bansal
Author
Chief Justice
Bench
P.Sathasivam, V.S.Sirpurkar, K.G.Balakrishnan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the transfer of a matrimonial case from Agra to Dehradun is warranted due to the wife's financial inability to defend the case in Agra, despite the husband's health concerns. The Court emphasized that the respondent can adequately pursue his case in Dehradun, thus allowing the transfer of H.M.A. Case No. 426 of 2008. The decision underscores the importance of accessibility to justice for the financially disadvantaged party in matrimonial disputes.

Gunjan Bansal vs Atul Bansal · Niyam