Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-03-23

Anu Kaul vs Rajeev Kaul

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2009 SC 121
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Anu Kaul
Respondent
Rajeev Kaul
Bench
H.L. Dattu, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the interim maintenance order under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, directing the respondent to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month for the maintenance of the minor child during the pendency of the appeals. The Court noted that the respondent did not dispute the appellant's claims regarding his income and the child's educational needs. The Court declined to enhance the interim maintenance for the appellant, considering her employment and salary, but emphasized the necessity of supporting the child's education.

Anu Kaul vs Rajeev Kaul · Niyam