Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-03-31

Association Of Res.Of Mhow (Rom) & Anr vs Delimitation Commn.Of India & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 3278
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Association Of Res.Of Mhow (Rom) & Anr
Respondent
Delimitation Commn.Of India & Ors
Author
B.Sudershan Reddy
Bench
B. Sudershan Reddy, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Delimitation Act, 2002, emphasizing that periodic readjustment of constituencies is essential to ensure equal representation in a democracy, as mandated by Articles 81, 170, 330, and 332 of the Constitution. The Court clarified that the Delimitation Commission, constituted under Section 3 of the Act, is tasked with determining the allocation of seats based on the latest census figures, thereby addressing malapportionment issues. The appeal against the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition was dismissed, affirming the Commission's authority and the necessity of the delimitation process.

Association Of Res.Of Mhow (Rom) & Anr vs Delimitation Commn.Of India & Ors · Niyam