Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-03-03

Syed Askari Hadi Ali Augustine Imam&Anr vs State (Delhi Admn.) & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 3232
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Syed Askari Hadi Ali Augustine Imam&Anr
Respondent
State (Delhi Admn.) & Anr
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, B. Sudershan Reddy

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interplay between probate proceedings and criminal allegations of forgery concerning a Will, specifically under Sections 420, 468, and 34 of the IPC. The Court held that the pendency of probate proceedings does not preclude the initiation of criminal proceedings for forgery, establishing that both can coexist without one affecting the other. The appeal was allowed, affirming the validity of the criminal complaint against the appellants for alleged forgery of the Will.

Syed Askari Hadi Ali Augustine Imam&Anr vs State (Delhi Admn.) & Anr · Niyam