Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-03-23

Urmila Roy & Ors vs M/S Bengal Peerless ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 2086
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Urmila Roy & Ors
Respondent
M/S Bengal Peerless ...
Author
Harjit Singh Bedi
Bench
Harjit Singh Bedi, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, specifically Sections 4(1), 6(1), and 11-A. The Court held that the acquisition was a colorable exercise of power as it was intended to benefit a private entity, Bengal Peerless, without proper notification of the beneficiary, thus violating the rights of the landowners. The Court ruled in favor of the appellants, declaring the acquisition proceedings invalid and quashing the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Act.

Urmila Roy & Ors vs M/S Bengal Peerless ... · Niyam