Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-03-03

Fida Hussain Bohra vs State Of Maharashtra

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 2080
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Fida Hussain Bohra
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the cancellation of anticipatory bail granted under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, emphasizing that the High Court erred in setting aside the bail order without sufficient grounds. The Court held that the appellant complied with bail conditions and that the investigating agency had deemed the conditions unnecessary. The judgment clarified the distinction between appeals against bail grants and cancellations, ultimately reinstating the anticipatory bail granted by the Sessions Judge.

Fida Hussain Bohra vs State Of Maharashtra · Niyam