Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-03-31

Raghuvir Singh Matolya & Ors vs Hari Singh Malviya & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SC (SUPP) 2222
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Raghuvir Singh Matolya & Ors
Respondent
Hari Singh Malviya & Ors
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that for the purpose of calculating compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, both dearness allowance and house rent allowance should be included in the deceased's income. The Court emphasized that dearness allowance is part of the income and that house rent allowance benefits the family, not just the employee. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to enhance the compensation amount to Rs. 5,28,000 by applying a multiplier of 11, thus affirming the inclusion of these allowances in the compensation calculation.

Raghuvir Singh Matolya & Ors vs Hari Singh Malviya & Ors · Niyam