Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-03-17

Raghuvalasa Chiranjeevi Rao vs State Of Ap & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Raghuvalasa Chiranjeevi Rao
Respondent
State Of Ap & Ors
Bench
H.L. Dattu, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's judgment in Second Appeal No. 347 of 1997 was unsustainable as it contravened the mandatory provisions of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court emphasized that the High Court must determine if any substantial question of law arises from the pleadings before proceeding with the case. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and directed it to reconsider the matter in accordance with the law.

Raghuvalasa Chiranjeevi Rao vs State Of Ap & Ors · Niyam