Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-03-19

Jagdish vs State Of M.P

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jagdish
Respondent
State Of M.P
Bench
G.S. Singhvi, B.N. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the acquittal rendered by the Trial Court was not perverse, and the High Court erred in interfering with this decision by convicting the appellant under Section 302 IPC. The Court restored the Trial Court's order of acquittal, emphasizing the sanctity of the lower court's findings when not shown to be unreasonable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the appellant was discharged from bail obligations.

Jagdish vs State Of M.P · Niyam