Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-07-06

MAHESH CHANDRA GUPTA, ADVOCATE vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 2009/70899
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAHESH CHANDRA GUPTA, ADVOCATE
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Author
S.H. KAPADIA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the appointment of Dr. Satish Chandra as Additional Judge of the Allahabad High Court, determining whether it violated Article 217(1) and Article 217(2) of the Constitution of India. The Court found that the appointment process lacked adherence to the mandatory consultation requirement, as the necessary report from the High Court Collegium was not provided to the constitutional authorities. Consequently, the appointment was deemed unconstitutional, leading to the quashing of Dr. Chandra's appointment as Additional Judge.

MAHESH CHANDRA GUPTA, ADVOCATE vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. · Niyam