Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-07-23

P.K.PALANISAMY vs N.ARUMUGHAM

Citation / case number
SC 2009/2166
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P.K.PALANISAMY
Respondent
N.ARUMUGHAM
Author
S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India concerning the delay in payment of court fees in a recovery suit. The Court held that the trial court's allowance of the respondents' application to set aside an ex parte decree was justified, as the respondents had not raised objections regarding the delay in court fees during earlier proceedings. The Court emphasized the importance of ensuring that litigants are not unduly penalized for procedural lapses, thereby upholding the High Court's decision to allow the revision petition.

P.K.PALANISAMY vs N.ARUMUGHAM · Niyam