VANNA CLAIRE KAURA TR.CONT.ATR. vs GAURI ANIL INDULKAR .

The Supreme Court addressed an application under Section 11(5), 11(9), and 11(12) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from agreements between the applicant and respondents regarding a water park business. The Court held that the existence of an arbitration clause in the agreements necessitated the appointment of an arbitrator, as the respondents failed to appoint one despite being notified. Consequently, the Court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes.