Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-07-07

RAJASTHAN JUDICIAL SERVICE OFFICERS ASSN vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Citation / case number
SC 2003/26367
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAJASTHAN JUDICIAL SERVICE OFFICERS ASSN
Respondent
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Author
MARKANDEY KATJU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, in this writ petition under Article 32, addressed the legality of Notification No. Estt.(RJS)/118/2003 concerning the recruitment of 19 posts in the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service. The Court reaffirmed its earlier ruling in Veena Verma's case, emphasizing that the strength of the service can only be varied through a specific order under Rule 6(2) of the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, and that mere creation of posts does not suffice. Consequently, the Court held that the notification was invalid as it did not comply with the requisite legal framework, thus protecting the interests of existing judicial officers against reduced promotion opportunities.

RAJASTHAN JUDICIAL SERVICE OFFICERS ASSN vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN · Niyam