Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-07-29

KARNAIL SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
SC 2002/17141
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KARNAIL SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Author
P. Sathasivam
Bench
K.G. BALAKRISHNAN,R.V. RAVEENDRAN,D.K. JAIN,P. SATHASIVAM,J.M. PANCHAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that compliance with Section 42 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is mandatory, and failure to adhere to this requirement can prejudice the accused. The Court emphasized the need for strict compliance with procedural safeguards to prevent arbitrary enforcement of the law. The conflicting views from previous judgments were resolved, affirming that the prosecution must prove adherence to the statutory provisions for searches and seizures without a warrant.

KARNAIL SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA · Niyam