Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-07-15

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd vs Rajiv Kumar Loomba & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 3141
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd
Respondent
Rajiv Kumar Loomba & Anr
Bench
V.S. Sirpurkar, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission upheld the decision of the District Consumer Forum, ruling that the appellant improperly charged the respondent Rs. 7,000 for a catalytic converter that was not legally required for vehicles sold in Chandigarh at the time. The Commission noted that the Central Government's policy mandated catalytic converters only for vehicles sold in certain metropolitan cities, and since the respondent did not opt for one, the charge was deemed arbitrary. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower forums' findings and rejecting the appellant's arguments regarding pricing interference by consumer forums.

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd vs Rajiv Kumar Loomba & Anr · Niyam