Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-07-22

Vanna Claire Kaura Tr.Cont.Atr vs Gauri Anil Indulkar & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 3136
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vanna Claire Kaura Tr.Cont.Atr
Respondent
Gauri Anil Indulkar & Ors
Author
Dalveer Bhandari
Bench
Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled on the application under Section 11(5), 11(9), and 11(12) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for the appointment of an arbitrator due to disputes arising from agreements between the parties regarding a water park project. The Court emphasized the binding nature of arbitration clauses in agreements and held that the applicant was entitled to seek arbitration as the respondents failed to appoint their arbitrator. Consequently, the Court appointed an arbitrator to resolve the disputes as per the arbitration agreement.

Vanna Claire Kaura Tr.Cont.Atr vs Gauri Anil Indulkar & Ors · Niyam