Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-07-14

Jagbir Singh vs Haryana State Agr.Marketing Board & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 3004
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jagbir Singh
Respondent
Haryana State Agr.Marketing Board & Anr
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
R. M. Lodha, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the termination of the appellant's services by the Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board violated Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as he was not provided with notice, pay in lieu of notice, or retrenchment compensation. However, the Court noted a shift in jurisprudence, stating that reinstatement with back wages is not automatic and may be inappropriate in certain circumstances. The High Court's decision to set aside the Labour Court's award for reinstatement was upheld, emphasizing that compensation may be a more suitable remedy than reinstatement in this case.

Jagbir Singh vs Haryana State Agr.Marketing Board & Anr · Niyam