Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-07-21

Commnr. Of I.T., Madurai vs M/S. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SC (SUPP) 2013
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commnr. Of I.T., Madurai
Respondent
M/S. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd
Author
Tarun Chatterjee
Bench
Aftab Alam, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Madras High Court, affirming that the expenditure incurred on the replacement of machinery by the respondent was revenue in nature and thus allowable as a deduction under Section 31 and Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court clarified that such expenditures should not be classified as capital expenditures, as they pertain to the replacement of parts rather than the acquisition of new assets. Consequently, the appeal by the revenue was dismissed, allowing the respondent's claim for deduction.

Commnr. Of I.T., Madurai vs M/S. Sri Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd · Niyam