Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-07-28

State Of M.P.& Ors vs Ramesh Chandra Bajpai

Citation / case number
2010 AIR SCW 2748
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of M.P.& Ors
Respondent
Ramesh Chandra Bajpai
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
Deepak Verma, G.S. Singhvi, S. B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, affirming that the respondent, a Physical Training Instructor, is entitled to the UGC pay scale as per the precedent set in P.S. Ramamohana Rao v. A.P. Agricultural University [1997 (8) SCC 350]. The Court emphasized that denying the pay scale would lead to discrimination against the respondent, given that other Physical Training Instructors had already received the UGC scale. The Court found that the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh (Indian Systems of Medicine and Homeopathy) Class III Ministerial Services Recruitment Rules, 1987, and the Madhya Pradesh Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1990, did not preclude the respondent's claim for parity in pay.

State Of M.P.& Ors vs Ramesh Chandra Bajpai · Niyam