KARTICK CHANDRA MANDAL vs NETAI MONDAL(DEAD)BY LRS. .

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the Calcutta High Court's judgment allowing a Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC. The Court held that the plaintiff, having established his title and possession over the B schedule property, was entitled to recovery of possession and permanent injunction against the defendants who claimed rights through an alleged oral exchange. The Court emphasized that a valid partition must be legally recognized and that mere possession does not confer title without proper legal backing, thus affirming the lower courts' decisions.