Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-01-05

MANOJ MENON vs E.K.ABDUL HAMMED .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/11219
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MANOJ MENON
Respondent
E.K.ABDUL HAMMED .

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court exercised its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to allow the appellant an opportunity to argue the merits of the appeal before the High Court, despite finding no legal infirmity in the High Court's judgment. The Court directed that a sum of Rs. 50,000 already deposited by the appellant be treated as costs for condonation of delay, and an additional Rs. 25,000 be paid to the plaintiff-respondent No. 1. The Court urged the High Court to expedite the disposal of the appeal within six weeks.

MANOJ MENON vs E.K.ABDUL HAMMED . · Niyam