Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-01-28

YUNUS (BABOOBHAI) A. HAMID PADVEKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/25853
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
YUNUS (BABOOBHAI) A. HAMID PADVEKAR
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT,ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court's dismissal of the appellant's Writ Petition, citing that it was highly belated and that the appellant had already received compensation for the acquired land. The Court noted that Section 39(2a) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, applies only to undeveloped land, and the land in question was developed. The Court emphasized that delay or laches must be considered when exercising discretionary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

YUNUS (BABOOBHAI) A. HAMID PADVEKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . · Niyam