Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-01-13

REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER-CUM-L.A.O. vs SHAIK AZAM SAHEM ETC.ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 2003/15340
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER-CUM-L.A.O.
Respondent
SHAIK AZAM SAHEM ETC.ETC.
Author
S.B. SINHA,LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA,B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, ,
Bench
S.B. SINHA,LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA,B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, specifically Section 4(1) and Section 18. The Court upheld the High Court's enhancement of compensation for acquired land, determining that the market value should be Rs.1,90,000/- per acre based on prior sales and market conditions. The Court affirmed the principle that compensation must reflect fair market value, leading to the dismissal of the appeals against the High Court's decision.

REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER-CUM-L.A.O. vs SHAIK AZAM SAHEM ETC.ETC. · Niyam