Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-01-29

MADHUMATI ATCHUT PARAB vs RAJARAM V. PARAB .

Citation / case number
SC 2000/18141
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MADHUMATI ATCHUT PARAB
Respondent
RAJARAM V. PARAB .
Author
TARUN CHATTERJEE
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE,AFTAB ALAM, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 7 of the Goa Tenancy Act, 1964, the Mamlatdar does not possess the authority to grant a negative declaration regarding tenancy status. The Court affirmed the High Court's dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeal, emphasizing that the Mamlatdar's jurisdiction is limited to determining whether a person is or was a tenant, not to declare that a person is not a tenant. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower courts' decisions.

MADHUMATI ATCHUT PARAB vs RAJARAM V. PARAB . · Niyam