Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-01-29

Ghaziabad Development Authority vs Ramesh Chandra Pandiya

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2009 SC 645
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ghaziabad Development Authority
Respondent
Ramesh Chandra Pandiya
Bench
Aftab Alam, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the dispute regarding the allotment of plots under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The Court held that the cancellation of the original allotment was justified due to the respondent's failure to take possession and pay the required instalments as per the allotment terms. The Court affirmed the National Commission's decision to deliver the alternative plot at the original price but clarified that the interest rate awarded should align with the principles established in Haryana Urban Development Authority Vs. Darsh Kumar, (2005) 9 SCC 449, thus modifying the compensation aspects.

Ghaziabad Development Authority vs Ramesh Chandra Pandiya · Niyam