Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-01-19

Kamal Raj Bansal vs Rajpaul Singh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Kamal Raj Bansal
Respondent
Rajpaul Singh
Bench
Aftab Alam, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the Civil Appeal filed by Kamal Raj Bansal, affirming the Rent Controller's decision to refuse leave to defend under Section 13B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949. The Court held that while the leave was rightly rejected, the landlord must still prove the necessary ingredients of the statute. The Court directed the Rent Controller to expedite the proceedings, ideally concluding within nine months, with no costs awarded.

Kamal Raj Bansal vs Rajpaul Singh · Niyam