Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-02-13

BAL KRISHAN vs VICE CHAIRMAN.DDA.

Citation / case number
SC 2007/23715
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BAL KRISHAN
Respondent
VICE CHAIRMAN.DDA.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court set aside the directions of the High Court regarding the payment of balance amount for a plot allotted by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), as the respondent could not demonstrate any outstanding payment by the appellant. The Court emphasized that the entire cost of the plot had been deposited by the appellant as per the Lok Adalat's decision. The judgment clarifies that directions lacking evidentiary support cannot be sustained, thereby partially allowing the appeal.

BAL KRISHAN vs VICE CHAIRMAN.DDA. · Niyam