Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-02-17

M. CHANDRU vs CHENNAI METROPOLITAN DEV. AUTH.

Citation / case number
SC 2007/12646
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. CHANDRU
Respondent
CHENNAI METROPOLITAN DEV. AUTH.
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. SINHA,MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of Infrastructure Development Charges (IDC) imposed by the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) on behalf of the Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The Court held that the CMDA has the authority to collect IDC as it is a local authority responsible for water supply and sewerage services, thus satisfying the quid pro quo requirement. The appeal against the High Court's dismissal of the writ petitions was therefore rejected, affirming the validity of the IDC collection process.

M. CHANDRU vs CHENNAI METROPOLITAN DEV. AUTH. · Niyam