Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-02-18

CITY MONTESSORI SCHOOL vs STATE OF U.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/20318
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CITY MONTESSORI SCHOOL
Respondent
STATE OF U.P. .
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. SINHA,CYRIAC JOSEPH, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which were quashed by the High Court due to lack of proper opportunity for affected parties to be heard. The Court reaffirmed that the Collector must provide a reasonable opportunity for hearing, as established in Farid Ahmed v. Ahmedabad Municipal Committee, AIR 1976 SC 2095. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing that the lessee had the locus standi to challenge the acquisition despite the landowners' acquiescence, thus maintaining the principle of legality in land acquisition proceedings.

CITY MONTESSORI SCHOOL vs STATE OF U.P. . · Niyam