RAM PHAL vs STATE OF HARYANA

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's dismissal of a writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was unsustainable due to the lack of examination of the issues raised by the appellant and the absence of a reasoned order. The Court emphasized that providing reasons is essential for lawful decision-making, citing Raj Kishore Jha vs. State of Bihar (2003) 11 SCC 519, which states that 'Reason is the heartbeat of every conclusion.' Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.